Morrison, Albanese leaders’ debate will shape the final weeks of the campaign

The planning for the debate considered a scenario where the two leaders launched these challenges against each other during the live broadcast, but there were doubts about whether it would happen. It has been a safe campaign in many ways, with few surprises on either side, but that changed on Sunday night when Morrison and Albanese chose to step it up against each other.

Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese and Prime Minister Scott Morrison during the second leaders’ debate of the election campaign.

Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese and Prime Minister Scott Morrison during the second leaders’ debate of the election campaign.Credit:Alex Ellinghausen

This had the obvious downside of looking aggressive to viewers at home and rebounding on both leaders. Yet the two men have spent the past three years goading each other – and, yes, yelling at each other – on the floor of Parliament. Four weeks into the election campaign, the time was right for them to test each other.

They both signed up for a debate, after all. And that is what viewers got.

While Morrison painted Albanese as a risk, there was a crucial moment that was incredibly risky for the prime minister – when he held out his hand at the moderator, 60 Minutes reporter Sarah Abo, because he wanted her to stop interrupting while he questioned Albanese. The message? Talk to the hand. There were other moments when Albanese could not be stopped, either. The key difference was Morrison’s body language.

That image, when a very good moderator could not stop the two leaders from savaging each other, will probably be remembered as the big moment of the debate. It captured the intensity of the contest.


Albanese was well prepared and on the attack. This was noteworthy because one of the questions of this campaign has been about his preparation. Is he ready? Is he up to the job? The debate answered the doubts about his performance.

This did not mean Albanese leapt ahead of Morrison on Sunday night. Australians know that Morrison is an assured performer and a strong campaigner. He was across key policy details, such as in aged care, and met those expectations.

On national security, however, Albanese laid a plan that probably gave him an edge. Knowing the attack would be that Labor was weak on China, he made the point that United States Marines were stationed in Darwin under a security agreement signed by Labor, but that the Port of Darwin had been sold to China under a Coalition government.

The two leaders matched each other in their final remarks also. Morrison portrayed Albanese as a danger to voters. “A small target is a big risk,” he said. He added that now was not the time to take a risk. It was a variation of his message from the last campaign: “Now is not the time to turn back.”

Albanese had the advantage of the last word and did not waste it. He hammered the messages about insecure work, climate action, respect for women and timed his final words with precision to end on the four words he promised he would never say as prime minister: “That’s not my job.”

Expectations were lower for Albanese and there will be a strong sentiment that he was the winner in the debate because he exceeded expectations. He certainly proved he is match-fit for the final stretch.

Yet the verdict from viewers at home was in line with the view from the floor. This was a very tight contest.

And the election might be just as tight. The polls show Labor has a strong lead and the odds seem against a Coalition victory, yet Morrison proved at the last election that he can tip the balance in the final days. Anything can happen when there are two weeks to go.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.